Flutter Made Simple: Applying SOLID Principles
Discover the simplicity behind building better Flutter apps. Uncover the magic of SOLID principles and learn how they can make your code cleaner and more maintainable.
SOLID Principles
Principle | Explanation |
---|---|
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) | A class should have only one reason to change. |
Open/Closed Principle (OCP) | A class should be open for extension but closed for modification. |
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) | Objects of a superclass should be able to replace objects of the subclass without affecting correctness. |
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) | A class should not be forced to implement interfaces it does not use. |
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) | High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions. |
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
A solid principle begins with an “S”: the SINGLE RESPONSIBILITY PRINCIPLE.
A class should have only one reason to change, and it should encapsulate only one responsibility or job within a software system.
This principle promotes
* clarity,
* collaboration and parallel development,
* testability,
* reduced code coupling,
* maintainability, and
*flexibility by ensuring that each class has a well-defined purpose and that changes to one aspect of the system do not affect unrelated aspects encapsulated within the same class.
Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
In addition, there is a second big principle that starts with an “O” called the OPEN-CLOSED PRINCIPLE.In summary, the Open/Closed Principle encourages a design approach that supports
* future changes and enhancements without modifying existing code,
* contributing to a more maintainable,
* scalable, and
* adaptable software system.
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Lastly, the last principle that is very important in software engineering, which starts with a “D”, is the DEPENDENCY INVERSION PRINCIPLE, which states that high-level modules must not depend on low-level modules without an abstraction.
It states that high-level modules (which contain the main business logic) should not depend on low-level modules (which implement details), but both should depend on abstractions.
Additionally, abstractions should not depend on details; details should depend on abstractions.
This principle encourages the use of interfaces or abstract classes to create a level of indirection,
* allowing for flexibility,
* extensibility,
* ease of testing, and
* easier maintenance in a software system.
..
- Increased maintainability
- Reduced code size
- Improved code quality
- Easy to understand
- Easy to maintain
- Easy to extend
- Efficient
Here are some key benefits of following the YAGNI principle:
- Reduced development time
- Improved code quality
- Increased flexibility and adaptability
- Reduced risk of technical debt
Comments
Post a Comment